Symbolic model critical thinking

How do I make a symbolical model for these two arguments? 1. If keeping your manufacturing plants in the USA is not profitable then you should not keep the plants in the USA. However, keeping your manufacturing plants in the USA is profitable. Thus, you should keep the plants in the USA. 2. Either Enron employees saw their retirement funds vanish due to a gap in the law concerning accounting procedures or due to unethical business practices. If Enron Employees saw their retirement funds vanis due to either of these factors then new laws should b e passed to prevent this type of thing from happening again. The obvious conclusion is that new laws should be passed to prevent this ty... click for more

Working with propositional reasoning.

Consider the problem below. Answer the question given after the description of the problem. Write out a model of the logical structure of your reasoning, the logical structure of your premises, and your answer. You are helping Trinity pick her classes for next semester. Trinity asks you about taking International Buisness Polices, BUINB489. You determine the following facts: Trinity can take BUINB489 if and only if she has taken either ECON210 or BUMGT304. Trinity has not taken ECON210, but Trinity has taken BUMGT304. Can trinity take BUINB489?

How do deconstructive arguments work?

Deconstructive arguments work by demonstrating that a position's premises yield contradictory conclusions when entailments are carefully considered. Such arguments are useful with respect to doctrinal issues because they sidestep 'inadequacy of cognitive processes' or 'irrelevance of evidence' objections. I provide a 'doctrinaire example'.

truth values, enthymemes, fallacies, categorical syllogisms, symbols of arguments in the attached article.

Summarize the arguments and show how they are linked together. (Identify all statements as premises or conclusion and all the enthymematic materials. Discuss truth value of each one of the statements in the arguments summarized. Are there any fallacies committed in the article and re-express the deductive arguments (if any) as categorical syllogisms (sorites) if necessary. Show if they are valid or not. I also want to know how to symbolize the deductive arguments (if any) and show whether they are valid or not.

SYLLOGISM VALIDITY TESTING EXERCISE

SYLLOGISM VALIDITY TESTING EXERCISE To be a valid syllogism, the conclusion must be proven by the reasons. Carefully study the following syllogisms and decide if they are valid or invalid: 1. All zebras are striped animals. No zebras are polar bears. Therefore, no polar bears are striped animals. 2. All clowns are funny individuals. Some sad people are clowns. Therefore, some sad people are funny individuals. 3. Some sticky substances are yucky things. All taffy is a sticky substance. Therefore, some taffy is a yucky thing. 4. All items made of gold are expensive items. Some rings are items made of gold. Therefore, some rings are expensive items. 5. All ... click for more