<< Prev Showing: 16-20 of 111 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 ·DO MITHOLOGY, RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY AND SCIENCE SAY ESSENTIALY THE SAME BUT IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES?
SPECIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL THEORIES IN FAVOR OR AGAINST THE CAPTION STATEMENT
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
27449
OTA ID:
104340
Peter Singer - Famine, Affluence and Morality
In Peter Singer's view he feels that everyone should live within "MARGINAL UTILITY". I do not feel that this is feesible. He does not take into account that the people he wants to give up their money have earned it or he hasn't yet set any standards for what is Marginal Utility, from a rich person to a middle class person to a poor. I am looking for help in gathering thoughts and views on why this marginal utility view is wrong.
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
29159
OTA ID:
101746
Virtue ethics in regards with Rachels and Aristotle
Instead of me worrying about how I should determine if my actions are 'right', should I be concerned only with how to be a good person? What kind of arguments would Rachels and Aristotle have?
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
30423
OTA ID:
102773
Can 'torture ever be justified, and if so under what circumstances?
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
30425
OTA ID:
102137
Ethical Egoist argument with reference to Rachels analysis of morality
Why should I be moral if I do not benefit from the action?
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
30426
OTA ID:
102137
<< Prev Showing: 16-20 of 111 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 · 106-110 · 111-111 ·Page generated in 0.0135 seconds