<< Prev Showing: 11-15 of 111 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 ·implications and justifications of the relativeness of ethics
In your opinion - Which are the most important Philosophers to cite when viewing the justifications and implications for stating that all ethical statements are relative?
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
21560
OTA ID:
104340
analyzing if morality requires a religious base - James Rachels argument
James Rachels argues in "The Divine Command Theory" (the TA needs to know this argument to help me) that it cannot be accepted, even by religious believers, because it leads to serious doubts about the perfecton of God. I need a TA to help me analyze his arguments concerning whether "morality" requires a religious base. I don't agree that morality requires religious belief. One of my arguments: Where does God gather information to set the standards of right and wrong?
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
25728
OTA ID:
102137
James Rachels "The Challenge of Cultural Relativism" and the relativism argument
Exactly what is a 'relativism argument'? Are there any consequences of relativism? and is there a right or wrong to it? I have tried to analyze and summarize the article, I need to know if I am understanding it correctly and if there are areas I should elaborate on. The piece I read talked abut how different cultures have different moral codes. ie. the Greeks ate the bodies of their dead and the Callatians burned theirs. Cultural relativism seems to just be that, you judge others based on what your culture deems right, using it as a method of comparison. The cultural differences argument - seems to be based on what people believe and that everything is subjective. The consequences of t... click for more
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
26460
OTA ID:
104435
Business Ethics - Corporate Character
I'm supporting Jennifer Morre's Corporate Character theory, that no individual should be responsible for the act of company since it's the corporate character which shapes their behavior. So what other possible reasons are there to support this argument? (reasons that she never mentioned)
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
27230
OTA ID:
104435
WHAT ARE MAJOR PHILOSOPHICAL THEORIES TO APPLY IN ORDER TO SUPPORT AND DEBATE AGAINST RELIGION?
PHILOSOPHY OF THE RELIGION IF A CONCEPT OF GOD COMBINES THE PERFECT KINDNESS, UNLIMITED POWER, INFINITE KNOWLEDGE, THEN OUR EXPERIENCE OF TERRORISM, ARMED FORCES CONFLICT, GENOCIDE, EARTHQUAKE AND, HUNGER CONTITUTE A GOOD REASON NOT TO BELIEVE IN GOD. ANALYZE AND DISCUSS THIS SITUATION
Subject:
Philosophy
Topic:
Ethics and Value Theory
Posting ID:
27447
OTA ID:
102713
<< Prev Showing: 11-15 of 111 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 · 106-110 · 111-111 ·Page generated in 0.0149 seconds