<< Prev Showing: 76-80 of 243 Next >>
· 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 ·Real Analysis Q / Sigma-algebra
Suppose X is a measurable space, E belongs to the sigma algebra ( I believe to the sigma algebra in X) , let us consider X\E = Y. Show that all sets B which can be expressed as A\E, where A belongs to the sigma algebra in X, form a sigma-algebra in Y. Please justify every step and claim you make in the solution. I know this problem is straight forward from the def of sigma-algebra, but I want to double check my answer.
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Real Variables
Posting ID:
47937
OTA ID:
103300
Explanation of the condition - not independent of the Jacobians of functions.
Real Analysis Jacobians(I) Explanation of the condition - not independent of the Jacobians of functions.
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Real Variables
Posting ID:
48213
OTA ID:
104119
Real analysis Topology and sigma algebra
1). Prove that any sigma-algebra, which contains a finite number of memebers is also a topology. ( the Q in another words : to show that there exist a sequence of disjoint members of a sigma algebra which contains infinite no. of memebers). 2). Does there exist an infinite sigma-algebra which has only countably many members? ( ofcourse justify, examples, anything needed to prove any claims made in the solution)
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Real Variables
Posting ID:
48330
OTA ID:
101298
1).If f: X--> C ( C is complex plane) is measurable, then prove that f^-1({0}) ( f inverse of 0 or any other point) is a measurable set in X. 2). If E is measurable set in X and if X_E ( x) = { 1 if x is in E, 0 if x is not in E} then X_E is a measurable function. Now I want you to prove the other direction, that is, I want you to show that If X_E(x) is measurable, then E is measurable. I believe that X_E(x) here is the characteristic function ( not sure about the name, but it is defined above). ( these 2 questions for REAL ANALYSIS class, graduate level).
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Real Variables
Posting ID:
48745
OTA ID:
101298
Suppose u(x) : X--> R v(x) : X --> R Both u(x) and v(x) are measurable Let f(x) : x --> R^2 f(x) = (u(x), v(x) ) Then f (x) is measurable Now prove a generalization of the above. That is, prove: if u_1(x) : X--> R u_2(x): X--> R . . . . u_n(x) : X--> R u_1,...,u_n are measurable and if f(x) : X --> R^n then prove that f = ( u_1,u_2,...,u_n) is measurable Please I want a detialed proof and justify every step you make, I need this next hour if possible..thanks.
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Real Variables
Posting ID:
48784
OTA ID:
101298
<< Prev Showing: 76-80 of 243 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 · 106-110 · 111-115 · 116-120 · 121-125 · 126-130 · 131-135 · 136-140 · 141-145 · 146-150 · 151-155 · 156-160 · 161-165 · 166-170 · 171-175 · 176-180 · 181-185 · 186-190 · 191-195 · 196-200 · 201-205 · 206-210 · 211-215 · 216-220 · 221-225 · 226-230 · 231-235 · 236-240 · 241-243 ·Page generated in 0.0137 seconds