<< Prev Showing: 231-235 of 498 Next >>
· 206-210 · 211-215 · 216-220 · 221-225 · 226-230 · 231-235 · 236-240 · 241-245 · 246-250 · 251-255 · 256-260 ·I just want to make sure they are correct. If I am wrong please explain why. Sensitivity analysis information in computer output is based on the assumption of no coefficient change one coefficient change two coefficient change all coefficients change I think the correct answer is one coefficient change Let M be the number of units to make and B be the number of units to buy. If if cost $2 to make a unit and $3 to buy a unit and 4000 units are needed, the objective function is Max 2M + 3B Min 4000 (M +B) Max 8000M + 12000B Min 2M + 3B I think the correct answer is Max 2M + 3B A transportation problem with 3 sources and 4 destination will have 7 terms in the objective... click for more
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Linear Operators
Posting ID:
60382
OTA ID:
101298
Find the complete optimal solution to this linear programming problem. Min 5X + 6Y s.t. 3X + Y >= 15 X + 2Y >= 12 3X + 2Y >= 24 X,Y >=0 x=3,y=3,z=48,s1=6,s2=0,s3=0 x=6,y=3,z=48,s1=6,s2=0,s3=0 x=3,y=6,z=48,s1=3,s2=0,s3=0 x=6,y=3,z=52,s1=6,s2=0,s3=0 I think the correct answer is x=3,y=6,z=48,s1=3,s2=0,s3=0 The optimal solution of the linear programming problem is at the intersection of constraints 1 and 2. Max 2x1 + x2 s.t. 4x1 + 1x2<=400 4x1 + 3x2 <= 600 1x1 + 2x2 <= 300 x1,x2 >=0 Compute the dual prices for the three constraints .45, .25, 0 .25, .25, 0 0, .25, .45 .45, .25, .25 I think the correct answer is ... click for more
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Linear Operators
Posting ID:
60394
OTA ID:
104808
Max Z = 3x1 + 5x2 s.t. 7x1 + 12x2 <= 136 3x1 + 5x2 <= 36 x1, x2 >=0 and interger Find the optimal solution put your answer int he form of a solution for Z= enter xx only I came up with 1524. If I put it in the form of xx would it become 15? I'm not even sure if that is the correct answer. Please advise.
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Linear Operators
Posting ID:
60477
OTA ID:
104808
Using the least squares method answer the following in a word doc. · What are the main strengths of this method? · What are its main shortcomings? · When would least squares be useful in the real world? · Does the use of linear algebra make this method easier to understand or use?
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Linear Operators
Posting ID:
60848
OTA ID:
103300
Current Electricity: Kirchhoff's Laws (ully explained)
(See attached file for full problem description) --- 2. Finding Unknowns Determine the unknowns in the circuit shown in Fig.3. How do electrical engineers use Kirchoff's current law and Kirchoff's voltage law to write a system of linear equations? • Based on your explanation, write a system of linear equations for Problem 2 at the top of this page. • Solve this system of linear equations for the unknowns. • Do these answers contain important information about the circuit? •What are the main strengths of this method? The main strengths of this method are: (1) It can be used to make predictions. (2) Since it is a linear model, it is easy to compute the dependent variable v... click for more
Subject:
Math
Topic:
Linear Operators
Posting ID:
60896
OTA ID:
104664
<< Prev Showing: 231-235 of 498 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 · 106-110 · 111-115 · 116-120 · 121-125 · 126-130 · 131-135 · 136-140 · 141-145 · 146-150 · 151-155 · 156-160 · 161-165 · 166-170 · 171-175 · 176-180 · 181-185 · 186-190 · 191-195 · 196-200 · 201-205 · 206-210 · 211-215 · 216-220 · 221-225 · 226-230 · 231-235 · 236-240 · 241-245 · 246-250 · 251-255 · 256-260 · 261-265 · 266-270 · 271-275 · 276-280 · 281-285 · 286-290 · 291-295 · 296-300 · 301-305 · 306-310 · 311-315 · 316-320 · 321-325 · 326-330 · 331-335 · 336-340 · 341-345 · 346-350 · 351-355 · 356-360 · 361-365 · 366-370 · 371-375 · 376-380 · 381-385 · 386-390 · 391-395 · 396-400 · 401-405 · 406-410 · 411-415 · 416-420 · 421-425 · 426-430 · 431-435 · 436-440 · 441-445 · 446-450 · 451-455 · 456-460 · 461-465 · 466-470 · 471-475 · 476-480 · 481-485 · 486-490 · 491-495 · 496-498 ·Page generated in 0.0962 seconds