<< Prev Showing: 6-10 of 47 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-47 ·A summary that explains the military downfall of the German army by 1942.
Why was Germany so successful militarily from 1939 to 1941 and so unsuccessful from 1942 to 1945?
Subject:
History
Topic:
War Studies
Posting ID:
9573
OTA ID:
103931
A study guide for World War II, covering 1941-1945
How do I prepare for an exam that covers World War II?
Subject:
History
Topic:
War Studies
Posting ID:
9589
OTA ID:
103931
Why did the U.S. eventually withdraw from Vietnam w/out achieving its objective?
By 1968, the United States had committed up to 500,000 troops and some of the most advanced weapons of war to the military effort in Vietnam. Yet Americans forces were unable to prevail. How does Tim o'Brien's "If I Die in a Combat Zone" help us to understand why the United States eventually withdrew from Vietnam without achieving its objective?
Subject:
History
Topic:
War Studies
Posting ID:
11047
OTA ID:
103931
United States'policy on Vietnam is examined.
The United States stunbled into a commitment to a shaky government in the 1950s and the unvarying policy of every subsequent administration was to do what was necessary to prevent the collapse of that government. They were doing so not because they anticipated victory but because they saw no alternative . However, high the cost of intervention they believed, the cost of not intervening, of allowing South Vietnam to fall, would be higher. Only when the national and international political situation had shifted to the point where it was possible for American policymakers to reassess the costs of containment- to conclude that the costs of continuing the commitment- was it possible for the Unite... click for more
Subject:
History
Topic:
War Studies
Posting ID:
12254
OTA ID:
103799
The United States stumbled into a commitment to a shaky government in the 1950s and the unvarying policy of every subsequent administration was to do what was necessary to prevent the collapse of that government. They were doing so not because they anticipated victory but because they saw no alternative . However, high the cost of intervention they believed, the cost of not intervening, of allowing South Vietnam to fall, would be higher. Only when the national and international political situation had shifted to the point where it was possible for American policymakers to reassess the costs of containment- to conclude that the costs of continuing the commitment- was it possible for the Unite... click for more
Subject:
History
Topic:
War Studies
Posting ID:
12255
OTA ID:
103931
<< Prev Showing: 6-10 of 47 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-47 ·Page generated in 0.0133 seconds