<< Prev Showing: 16-20 of 120 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 ·community assessment public health evaluation-web based
Standard Communityhealth assessment of vital stats, e.g. mortality, economics, education health clinics, ages, birth/dealth rates, I have a web site for the town of Middletown, New York (USA) for the assessment. The assessment would be all web based and prepared this is a good website to work with: http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/genInfo.php?locIndex=1159
Subject:
Health Sciences
Topic:
Measurement, Research Methods and Evaluation
Posting ID:
38435
OTA ID:
102789
Indepth Community / Public Health Assessment
Web based review of all asspects of Middletown NY, i.e. Demographics, ages, ethnic groups, income, health, mortality, economics, etc.
Subject:
Health Sciences
Topic:
Measurement, Research Methods and Evaluation
Posting ID:
38519
OTA ID:
104816
Differences betweenTheoretical and Conceptual Frames of Reference
Students and novice researchers often have difficulty in constructing a Frame of Reference for their study. This is an essential element in the research process as it links the study to the wider body of knowledge involved and helps to clarify the concepts and theories used with reference to the chosen research methods. This solution helps the student to decide whether their Frame of reference should be theoretical or conceptual.
Subject:
Health Sciences
Topic:
Measurement, Research Methods and Evaluation
Posting ID:
46589
OTA ID:
104120
understanding Frames of Reference in research
Students and novice researchers often find it difficult to construct a Frame of reference ( sometimes known as a research framework or algoithm) because they do not understand the purpose of the Framework or its derivation. This solution sets out the purposes of Frames of Reference, both theoretical and conceptual and examples of simple algorithms for each.
Subject:
Health Sciences
Topic:
Measurement, Research Methods and Evaluation
Posting ID:
46590
OTA ID:
104120
Compiling and presenting a rigorous literature review
Many students find it difficult to write a rigorous literature review, which is an essential starting point for any study. They can often identify papers and write a brief description of what they are about, but omit some important points. They do not understand the purpose of the review for their particular study so are too inclusive, not selecting ony appropriate texts for review. They fail to make a critical appraisal of the papers they review alongside the description of the content. They find it difficult to organise the review to avoid a repetitive style and invariably include their own opinion of the texts which is not relevant. This solution gives some guidelines which ... click for more
Subject:
Health Sciences
Topic:
Measurement, Research Methods and Evaluation
Posting ID:
46783
OTA ID:
104120
<< Prev Showing: 16-20 of 120 Next >>
· 1-5 · 6-10 · 11-15 · 16-20 · 21-25 · 26-30 · 31-35 · 36-40 · 41-45 · 46-50 · 51-55 · 56-60 · 61-65 · 66-70 · 71-75 · 76-80 · 81-85 · 86-90 · 91-95 · 96-100 · 101-105 · 106-110 · 111-115 · 116-120 ·Page generated in 0.0936 seconds